Wednesday, April 11
Life on Mars
Life on Mars – the finale
(BBC1. Tuesday. 9PM)

It would be foolish to argue otherwise – Life On Mars has been absolutely fantastic. Intelligent television without a hint of elitism; a thought-provoking concept which never resorted to preaching; and a drama fuelled by genuine mystery rather than blithering idiocy (Lost – take note).

So perhaps it can be forgiven for last night's vaguely complacent and horribly anticlimactic conclusion. I don’t contend for a moment that television dramas should be forbidden from leaving questions open, but when you’re left still taunted by the same question posed in the show’s tagline than there's got to be something wrong.

"Am I mad, am I in a coma, or have I traveled back in time?" - it was a question pondered by Sam Tyler at the beginning of every episode, and one which resonated in the minds of every Life on Mars viewer.

And it's a question which will outlive the series. Life On Mars has departed, but we’ll still be left asking it – 'Was he mad, was he in a coma, or did he travel back in time?'.

I'm probably being too tough on Life On Mars. But when your mind has been active all week, conjuring up different endings and juggling various theories, it doesn't just power-down as soon as the end credits roll. And naturally, that energy is soon applied to picking holes in the plot.

For no matter how hard I try, I'm just not wholly convinced by Sam’s relationship with WDC Cartwright. Yes, I know, things were very different in the seventies - sexual etiquette was a much plainer creative. Desires, I’m told, were expressed in much subtler ways back then. So maybe it’s just my noughties-centricity, but I never really detected that much chemistry between them.

Oh, of course, there was the occasional suggestive bristle or longing stare between them, and Annie always showed faith in Sam's unorthodox methods, but until the closing scenes, there was no evidence that she'd made a real romantic impact on him. And it’s hardly a case of Sam being emotionally reticent - he made no attempt to conceal his feelings for 2006 girlfriend Maya.

But to mull over such questions would ignore the point of Life On Mars. It was a programme which taught us all a lesson - that sometimes it's about getting results, and not asking how. It reminded us that when you get tied down debating niches and niceties, you can take your eyes off the bigger picture.

So, yes, maybe Life on Mars did break a few rules. And maybe there were ends left untied and boxes left unticked, but, my goodness, wasn't it a sublime drama?
posted by Robert Henry Jackman @ 06:44  
6 Comments:
  • At 11 April 2007 at 08:15, Blogger SchizoFishNChimps said…

    The misleading 1973 amnesia plotline was very clever, but it was a deception. I thought the ending was quite clear. Sam was in a coma and returned to the real world in 2007. Jumping off the roof was suicide. The girl at the end switching the TV off was switching off Sam Tyler's life.
    Very similar to Jacob's Ladder.

     
  • At 11 April 2007 at 08:19, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    So how do you explain 'Ashes to Ashes'? Is it a series entirely set in Sam's (dead) head?

     
  • At 11 April 2007 at 08:43, Blogger Chris Paul said…

    Perhaps fishnchimps, perhaps. Alternative is he was in 1973 all along and jumping off the roof was a neat way of ending the nightmare of 2007 where incidentally he couldn't feel a thing when he cut himself with a handy scalpel.

    Though his futurology was of course uncanny. Though people who are psychotic or bipolar or both do get some very solid ideas in their heads.

    But anyway, they can do anything with it now. All things are possible with the 1973 world far more interesting than anything in the 2007 we glimpsed.

    My review linked the end sequence to Talking Heads 'Heaven' with 1973 being the bar where everyone wants to be and where nothing ever happens.

    Agree with Robert about the chemistry. Think it was duff acting on one part to be honest.

     
  • At 11 April 2007 at 08:46, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    'Uncanny' is not the word - Sam was able to 'recall' the history of the IRA bombings, and also had concrete knowledge of 1980s politics.

    He certainly lived through the 1980s and 90s.

     
  • At 11 April 2007 at 08:57, Blogger Stuart Ian Burns said…

    Perhaps one of the questions which'll be raised in Ashes to Ashes is to how Gene Hunt can be a figment of two imaginations.

    Good review and I agree about the arc between Sam and Annie which has been a bit inconsistent across the seasons with bouts of amnesia as to aid what to whom about what.

     
  • At 13 April 2007 at 12:42, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Actually, this is already explained (I'm talking about the question, why two different persons would imagine the same characters).

    The new female character of Ashes to Ashes will look through Sam Tylers belongings (we see him recording stuff in the final episode). So Alex (the new main-character's name) knows about it all because of what Sam left behind.

    The shows main writer gave a long interview and resolved all this. So this is "official".

     
Post a Comment
<< Home
 
I'm tired of trying to get my foot in the door. It's time to follow the example of DCI Gene Hurt. It's time to kick the door down.
See my complete profile


Name: Robert Henry Jackman
Home: Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom

Opinions on...
Archives
Links